Home Alt › Forums › Recording Your Saxophone › new recording set up
- This topic has 36 replies, 10 voices, and was last updated 9 years, 8 months ago by
Anonymous.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 27, 2016 at 9:50 am #33467
Anonymous
Thanks Jf – the AKG C1000s looks quite good, could use it for singing as well.
You’ll have to let everyone know what mouthpiece in the $500 upwards range you intend to get.February 27, 2016 at 10:04 am #33468Anonymous
Sxpoet, which MAC did you buy? I thought they all come with built in speakers, they would be sufficient to play around with WAV files whilst you are learning the software. Just make a copy of any WAV file and play around with that. I was thinking about getting a MacBook Pro too, but Numbers can’t do macros!!!
Packing your recording equipment away is a better option, because it will stay cleaner and can’t be damaged accidentally.
February 27, 2016 at 10:39 am #33473This the microphone I have. It uses USB, no interface needed.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZKIyAuY2Vlg
February 27, 2016 at 12:08 pm #33481Anonymous
@Jeff – i bought a mac pro with the memory expanded to make it run faster with multiple Aps, logic pro etc..
Yes it does have internal speakers, but if i use the audio interface, i can connect yamaha monitors to the audio interface
for play back.
@william – i shall be using an audio interface for recording and playing back sound, so everything will connect to the audio interface.
I’m sure the usb microphone you use will be just as good or even better than mine.February 28, 2016 at 1:25 am #33499Anonymous
Hi William, I just watched the video. I am surprised that all he did was discuss the look and feel of the microphone. It reminds me of a beer commercial we have here that only mentions it’s temperature and says nothing about the taste of the beer! I would have expected a techie to use a signal generator and speakers to record some sounds of equal volume at different frequencies to demonstrate the MV51 sensitivity, after all its all about accurate sound capture.
What I would like to know is whether it’s lower frequency response performs well for the deeper Sax sounds. That is surely the main issue which is why we go for sensors with the largest diaphragm. Judging from your videos it works very well and its a pity that our suppliers didn’t have this one available when I bought my cheaper USB microphone.
“It’s all about the bass, bout the bass not the treble!”
February 28, 2016 at 8:39 am #33501Anonymous
one way to compare microphones is to read the technical stuff,
they all seem to have similar info like belowAudio Frequency bandwidth – 60 to 20000 Hz
Sensitivity – 5 mV/Pa
Equivalent Noise Level – 31 dB-A
Signal to Noise – 63 dB-A
Electrical Impedance – 200 Ohms
Recommended Load Impedance – 2000 Ohmsas well as the direction they pickup sound from, and whether or not
they pick up mechanical vibration sounds from the keys clunking.February 28, 2016 at 8:42 am #33502Anonymous
from what i gather, picking microphones is like picking reeds, and
what ever you do, don’t drop one on the floor or in water! lolFebruary 28, 2016 at 12:05 pm #33506Hi Jeff, the guy on Youtube talking about the shure mic did sound like a beer commercial. I don’t know much about microphones but I’m learning. Every thing thatI know sinks into what I don’t know. I learned the term Phantom power 17 years ago, just the term not what it is. Other things I learned are “Gain”, and how to adjust gain.XLR connectors, TRS connectors. I’ve been studying microphones all weekend so I can ask an intelligent question about mics, and then comes interfaces. My interface is 14teen years old. I once had logic pro installed in my mac pro 12 years ago. Logic pro was too complicated. I didn’t have enough time to learn Logic Pro. So I thrashed it and had a public burning years ago. I’m still learning Garage Band and
garage band I like. Back to the music and the horn. We can get so involved with electronics that we have no time for the music.February 28, 2016 at 2:09 pm #33521Correct William we can get to involved in all this recording gear, lets first
learn out to play the sax, wearing a bit thin now all this electronic jargon.February 28, 2016 at 7:36 pm #33532Anonymous
Yes William I agree. I have to wonder why companies make so many microphones. Each type should only require one ideal design, but there is a bewildering selection. A simple sound clip comparison would say far more in my opinion. Johnny’s recent comparative demo on the Guardala MP’s told me more than the specifications. At the end of the day it’s all about our personal sound, which is why I love to listen to other members recordings. My USB mic looks good from the specifications, but is clearly lacking in the bass range when I play back my recordings – I should have been more Shure – LOL
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.